点击此处
Flux3
三界流体
Tri-Modal Mobility System Interface
三栖立体流动系统接口
Land · Water · Low-Altitude
陆地 · 水面 · 低空
Global research validation in progress
全球共建验证中
→ Choose Your Path → 选择你的道路
Choose Your Path · 选择您的路径
Six ways to engage · 六种参与方式
Explore tri-modal architecture and system logic.
探索三栖架构与系统逻辑。
Access academic collaboration and research opportunities.
学术合作与研究机会。
Explore scenario-based validation and application.
基于场景的验证与应用探索。
Contribute to open modules and technical development.
参与开放模块与技术开发。
Engage in system-level participation and guidance.
系统级参与与战略指导。
Support system validation through community funding.
通过社区资金支持系统验证。
Navigation导航
Global System Interface Navigation · 导航
What Flux3 Is · Flux3 是什么
Flux3 is a system-level interface, not a vehicle or product form, designed to unify land, water, and low-altitude mobility under a single logic of control, energy, and safety. It represents a fundamental shift from discrete mobility products to an integrated capability infrastructure, establishing an architectural foundation for seamless transitions across domains.
Flux3 是一个系统级接口，而非交通工具或具体产品形态，旨在通过统一的控制、能源和安全逻辑连接陆地、水面和低空流动。它标志着从离散移动产品向集成能力基础设施的根本转变，为跨域无缝转换奠定架构基础。
Traditional Approach
传统方式
  • Single products
    单一产品
  • Hardware competition
    硬件竞争
  • Isolated modes
    孤立模式
Flux3 Approach
Flux3 方式
  • System interface
    系统接口
  • Unified logic
    统一逻辑
  • Tri-modal integration
    三栖集成
1
Why 94% Fail
为何 94% 失败
Single-direction hardware competition
单向硬件竞争
2
How Flux3 Wins
Flux3 如何胜出
System Interface + Verified Physical Constants
系统接口 + 验证的物理常数
The Three Variables
三大变量
1
LAND
陆地
EV supply chain restructuring
电动车供应链重构
2
SEA
水面
Water-based legacy asset activation
水域存量资产激活
3
AIR
低空
Urban vertical management systems
城市垂直管理系统
Current Phase
当前阶段
System modeling, simulation, and co-building.
系统建模、仿真与共建。
What Flux3 Is NOT · Flux3 不是什么
Understanding what Flux3 is not helps clarify its actual nature and purpose. The following distinctions are essential to avoid common misunderstandings about the system's scope and objectives.
理解 Flux3 不是什么有助于澄清其实际性质和目的。以下区分对于避免对系统范围和目标的常见误解至关重要。
Not a Vehicle
不是交通工具
Flux3 is not a transportation product or mobility device. It is a system interface architecture that enables tri-modal capability, not a specific vehicle form.
Flux3 不是交通产品或移动设备。它是一个实现三栖能力的系统接口架构，而不是特定的车辆形态。
Not a Business Model
不是商业模式
Flux3 does not represent a go-to-market strategy or revenue framework. It is a technical architecture under research validation, not a commercial deployment plan.
Flux3 不代表市场策略或收入框架。它是一个处于研究验证阶段的技术架构，而不是商业部署计划。
Not a Finished Solution
不是成品方案
Flux3 is not a completed system ready for deployment. It is an ongoing research initiative exploring fundamental questions about tri-modal mobility integration.
Flux3 不是准备部署的完整系统。它是一个正在进行的研究项目，探索关于三栖流动整合的基本问题。
Not a Closed Project
不是封闭项目
Flux3 is not proprietary technology controlled by a single entity. It is an open system architecture developed through global collaborative research and validation.
Flux3 不是由单一实体控制的专有技术。它是通过全球协作研究和验证开发的开放系统架构。

These boundaries define what Flux3 is not in order to clarify what it is: a system-level research initiative exploring the architectural foundations of tri-modal mobility.
这些界限定义了 Flux3 不是什么，以便澄清它是什么：一个探索三栖流动架构基础的系统级研究项目。
What Flux3 Can Be · Flux3 可以是什么
Application Domains & Possibilities · 应用领域与可能性
While Flux3 is not a product, it enables new possibilities across multiple domains by providing a unified system interface for tri-modal mobility. The following areas represent potential application contexts where the system architecture can create value. 虽然 Flux3 不是产品，但它通过为三栖流动提供统一的系统接口，在多个领域创造新的可能性。以下领域代表了系统架构可以创造价值的潜在应用场景。
Urban Logistics & Last-Mile Delivery
城市物流与最后一公里配送
Seamless transition between road, waterway, and vertical delivery networks in dense urban environments.
在密集城市环境中实现道路、水路和垂直配送网络之间的无缝转换。
Emergency Response & Disaster Relief
应急响应与灾害救援
Rapid deployment across multiple terrain types when traditional infrastructure is compromised.
当传统基础设施受损时，快速部署跨越多种地形类型。
Coastal & Island Connectivity
海岸与岛屿连接
Bridging land-water transitions in archipelago regions and coastal communities.
在群岛地区和沿海社区连接陆地-水域转换。
Smart City Infrastructure
智慧城市基础设施
Integration with urban management systems for coordinated multi-modal mobility.
与城市管理系统集成，实现协调的多模态流动。
Tourism & Recreational Mobility
旅游与休闲流动
Enhanced visitor experiences through seamless transitions across scenic environments.
通过跨越风景环境的无缝转换增强游客体验。
Industrial & Port Operations
工业与港口运营
Optimized material flow across land-water interfaces in logistics hubs.
在物流枢纽优化跨陆地-水域界面的物料流动。

These applications share a common requirement: the ability to transition between mobility modes without system discontinuity. Flux3 provides the architectural foundation that makes such transitions controllable and safe.
这些应用共享一个共同需求：在流动模式之间转换而不产生系统不连续性的能力。Flux3 提供了使这种转换可控且安全的架构基础。
Tri-Modal System Application Simulation · 三栖系统应用模拟场景
Validating System Logic Through Scenario Modeling · 通过场景建模验证系统逻辑
The following simulation demonstrates how Flux3 system architecture would address operational challenges in a specific geographic and functional context. This scenario-based validation helps identify critical system requirements and test architectural assumptions before physical implementation. 以下模拟展示了 Flux3 系统架构如何在特定地理和功能环境中应对运营挑战。这种基于场景的验证有助于在物理实施之前识别关键系统需求并测试架构假设。
Coastal Metropolitan Emergency Response
沿海大都市应急响应
Context & Parameters:
情境与参数：
Geographic: Coastal city with 5M+ population, 200km² urban area, 15% water coverage
Operational: Average 300 emergency calls/day, target response time <8 minutes
Challenge: Seasonal flooding increases response time by 250-400% using conventional single-mode vehicles
地理：拥有 500 万以上人口、200 平方公里城市面积、15% 水域覆盖的沿海城市
运营：平均每天 300 次紧急呼叫，目标响应时间 <8 分钟
挑战：使用传统单一模式车辆时，季节性洪水使响应时间增加 250-400%

System Requirements: How to maintain emergency response capability when primary infrastructure becomes inaccessible? The system must enable continuous operation across terrain transitions without requiring vehicle changes, manual mode switching, or separate dispatch coordination.
系统要求： 当主要基础设施无法使用时，如何保持应急响应能力？系统必须能够在地形转换中持续运行，无需更换车辆、手动模式切换或单独的调度协调。
Flux3 System Response
Flux3 系统响应
The Flux3 system provides a comprehensive solution by integrating tri-modal capabilities:
Flux3 系统通过集成三栖能力提供全面的解决方案：
Unified Response Units
统一响应单元
Simulation models emergency units with tri-modal capability maintaining operational continuity. Single units navigate flooded streets (water mode), access elevated structures (low-altitude mode), and operate on cleared roads (land mode) through automated mode transitions. 模拟配备三栖能力的应急单元，通过自动化模式转换，在淹水街道（水面模式）、高架结构（低空模式）和清理道路（陆地模式）上保持操作连续性。
System-Level Coordination
系统级协调
Central dispatch integrates real-time terrain data with vehicle capability profiles. Routing algorithms automatically select optimal mode transitions based on current conditions, eliminating manual coordination overhead. 中央调度将实时地形数据与车辆能力配置文件集成。路由算法根据当前条件自动选择最佳模式转换，消除手动协调开销。
Simulated Performance Metrics
模拟性能指标
Modeling indicates potential 60-70% reduction in average response time during flood conditions and 35-45% reduction in fleet size requirements compared to maintaining separate specialized vehicles. 建模表明，与维护单独的专用车辆相比，洪水条件下的平均响应时间可能减少 60-70%，车队规模需求减少 35-45%。

Validation Insights: This simulation validates that tri-modal capability creates value through operational continuity rather than novelty. The system interface enables mode transitions to become routine operational decisions rather than exceptional circumstances requiring specialized equipment.
验证洞察： 此模拟验证了三栖能力通过运营连续性而非新颖性创造价值。系统接口使模式转换成为常规运营决策，而不是需要专用设备的特殊情况。
Next Steps
后续步骤
Scenario refinement in progress. Expanding simulation parameters to include medical supply delivery, evacuation coordination, and multi-city network effects. 场景细化正在进行中。扩展模拟参数以包括医疗用品配送、疏散协调和多城市网络效应。
Timing · 时机
Timing · 时机
The convergence of three critical variables creates a unique window for tri-modal mobility system development. The following data and trends demonstrate why this moment represents an an inflection point for system-level innovation.
三个关键变量的汇聚为三栖流动系统开发创造了独特的时间窗口。以下数据和趋势展示了为什么这一时刻代表了系统级创新的拐点。
三个关键变量的汇聚为三栖流动系统开发创造了独特的时间窗口。以下数据和趋势展示了为什么这一时刻代表了系统级创新的拐点。
Market Readiness Indicators
市场准备度指标
18% → 45%
EV Market Penetration
电动车市场渗透率
2023-2030 projected
电动车市场渗透率：2023-2030 预测
$12B+
Urban Air Mobility Investment
城市空中交通投资
2020-2024
城市空中交通投资：2020-2024
200+
Waterway Infrastructure Modernization
水路基础设施现代化
Cities globally
水路基础设施现代化：全球城市
50M+
Autonomous System Validation
自动驾驶系统验证
Test kilometers
自动驾驶系统验证：测试公里
Technology Convergence Timeline
技术汇聚时间线
1
2
3
1
2020-2023: Foundation Phase
基础阶段
  • Battery energy density breakthrough (300+ Wh/kg)
    电池能量密度突破（300+ Wh/kg）
  • Low-altitude regulation frameworks emerging
    低空监管框架出现
  • Water-based electric propulsion maturation
    水基电力推进成熟
2
2024-2026: Integration Window ⭐ NOW
整合窗口 ⭐ 当前
  • Cross-domain control systems feasible
    跨域控制系统可行
  • Supply chain restructuring in progress
    供应链重构进行中
  • Regulatory sandboxes opening
    监管沙盒开放
3
2027-2030: Deployment Readiness
部署准备
  • System-level validation complete
    系统级验证完成
  • Multi-modal infrastructure integration
    多模态基础设施整合
  • Commercial pathway clarity
    商业路径清晰
Why Now? Critical Factors
为什么是现在？关键因素
Technology Maturity
技术成熟度
Core enabling technologies (batteries, sensors, control systems) have crossed viability thresholds simultaneously for the first first time.
核心使能技术（电池、传感器、控制系统）首次同时跨越可行性阈值。
Infrastructure Gap
基础设施差距
Traditional single-mode infrastructure faces $2.5T+ global maintenance backlog, creating openness to system-level alternatives.
传统单一模式基础设施面临 2.5 万亿美元+ 全球维护积压，为系统级替代方案创造开放性。
Regulatory Evolution
监管演变
Multi-jurisdictional frameworks for low-altitude and water-based mobility entering active development phase.
低空和水基流动的多司法管辖框架进入积极开发阶段。
Capital Availability
资本可用性
50B+ deployed in adjacent mobility sectors (EV, UAM, autonomous) creates ecosystem readiness for integration plays.
500 亿美元+ 部署在相邻流动领域（电动车、城市空中交通、自动驾驶）为整合创造生态系统准备度。

Window of Opportunity: 2024-2028
机会窗口：2024-2028
The current period represents a 4-year window where system architecture decisions will determine whether tri-modal mobility emerges as integrated infrastructure or remains fragmented across isolated domains. After 2028, path dependencies from single-mode investments will significantly increase integration costs.
当前时期代表一个 4 年窗口，系统架构决策将决定三栖流动是作为集成基础设施出现，还是在孤立领域中保持碎片化。2028 年后，单一模式投资的路径依赖将显著增加整合成本。
Three Variables · System Drivers · 三个变量 · 系统驱动因素
Three interdependent variables create the foundation for tri-modal mobility systems. These forces operate as mutually reinforcing dynamics that enable system-level transformation。 三个相互依存的变量为三栖流动系统奠定基础。这些力量作为相互强化的动力，促成系统层面的转型。

System Opportunity · 系统机会
When all three variables align simultaneously, tri-modal integration becomes architecturally feasible. This convergence window is historically unique. 当所有三个变量同时对齐时，三模态整合在架构上变得可行。这一汇聚窗口在历史上是独一无二的。
Entry Points · 入口点
Three Ways to Engage · 三种参与方式
Flux3 offers three distinct engagement pathways, each designed for different stakeholder contexts and contribution capacities. Choose the pathway that aligns with your objectives.
Flux3 提供三种不同的参与路径，每种都针对不同的利益相关者背景和贡献能力而设计。选择与您目标一致的路径。
Research & Academia · 研究与学术
Focus: System architecture validation and theoretical foundations
重点： 系统架构验证与理论基础
Contribution: Research collaboration, academic publications, theoretical modeling
贡献： 研究合作、学术出版、理论建模
Technical Co-Building · 技术共建
Focus: Module development and open-source contribution
重点：： 模块开发与开源贡献
Contribution: Code, engineering, testing, documentation
贡献： 代码、工程、测试、文档
Scenario Validation · 场景验证
Focus: Real-world application testing and industry integration
重点： 实际应用测试与行业整合
Contribution: Use case definition, pilot programs, operational feedback
贡献： 用例定义、试点项目、运营反馈

System Opportunity · 系统机会
All pathways contribute to system validation. No pathway requires financial investment. Each maintains clear boundaries and defined deliverables.
所有路径都为系统验证做出贡献。无需财务投资。每条路径都有明确的边界和可交付成果。
System · 系统
System Definition · 系统定义
Flux3 is a system interface architecture that enables tri-modal mobility through unified logic. It is not a product, but a framework for integration.
Flux3 是一个通过统一逻辑实现三栖流动的系统接口架构。它不是产品，而是整合框架。
Interface Architecture · 接口架构
System vs Product · 系统 vs 产品
Three Core Principles · 三个核心原则
Controllable State Transitions
可控状态转换
Seamless mode switching through unified control architecture
通过统一控制架构实现无缝模式切换
Physical Constant Validation
物理常数验证
Grounded in verified physical principles, not speculative technology
基于验证的物理原理，而非投机技术
Open Architecture
开放架构
Collaborative development through global research validation
通过全球研究验证进行协作开发

All pathways contribute to system validation. No pathway requires financial investment. Each maintains clear boundaries and defined deliverables.
所有路径都为系统验证做出贡献。无需财务投资。每条路径都有明确的边界和可交付成果。
System architecture defines the logic layer that enables tri-modal capability. Implementation details remain flexible within this framework.
系统架构定义了实现三栖能力的逻辑层。实施细节在此框架内保持灵活。
Tri-Modal as Structure · 三栖作为结构

Tri-modal is not a form factor. It is a controllable system state transition. Unified logic matters more than hardware shape.
三栖不是一种外形因素。它是一种可控的系统状态转换。统一逻辑比硬件形态更重要。
Three States, One System · 三种状态，一个系统
What Makes It Work · 运作原理
Unified Control Logic · 统一控制逻辑
Single control architecture manages all three modes
单一控制架构管理所有三种模式
Energy Management · 能源管理
Shared power system across mode transitions
跨模式转换的共享电力系统
Safety Framework · 安全框架
Consistent safety protocols in all states
所有状态下一致的安全协议

The system architecture enables mode transitions without changing the fundamental control logic. This is what makes tri-modal capability different from simply combining three separate vehicles.
系统架构使模式转换无需改变基本控制逻辑。这就是三栖能力与简单组合三种独立车辆的区别所在。
Abstract Architecture 抽象架构
The Flux3 system architecture is organized into five interconnected layers, each addressing specific aspects of system functionality while maintaining dependencies with adjacent layers. This structure enables modular development and validation while ensuring system-level coherence. The architecture is presented in abstract form to emphasize logical relationships over implementation details.
Flux3 系统架构由五个相互关联的层组成，每层都处理系统功能的特定方面，同时与相邻层保持依赖关系。这种结构支持模块化开发和验证，同时确保系统级的一致性。该架构以抽象形式呈现，旨在强调逻辑关系而非实施细节。
Interface Layer 接口层
Defines system boundaries and external interaction protocols
定义系统边界和外部交互协议
Control Logic Layer 控制逻辑层
Implements unified control frameworks across operational states
实施跨运行状态的统一控制框架
Energy Layer 能量层
Manages power distribution, storage, and optimization
管理功率分配、存储和优化
Safety & Redundancy Layer 安全与冗余层
Ensures fault tolerance and operational safety boundaries
确保容错和运行安全边界
Simulation & Validation Layer
仿真与验证层
Enables pre-deployment testing and system verification
支持部署前测试和系统验证
Each layer maintains specific responsibilities while exposing defined interfaces to adjacent layers. This separation enables independent development and testing of layer-specific functionality while maintaining system-level integration requirements. The architecture intentionally avoids prescribing implementation technologies, allowing different technical approaches to satisfy layer requirements as long as interface contracts are maintained.
每个层都保持特定的职责，同时向相邻层公开定义的接口。这种分离支持独立开发和测试层特定功能，同时保持系统级集成需求。该架构有意避免规定实施技术，允许不同的技术方法满足层要求，只要接口契约得以维护。
Validation · 验证
Validation · 验证
System validation proceeds through structured research and testing protocols.
系统验证通过结构化研究和测试协议进行。
Flux3 prioritizes architectural coherence before deployment readiness.
Flux3 优先考虑架构一致性，然后才是部署准备。
Validation Approach · 验证方法
Theoretical Modeling · 理论建模
Mathematical validation of control logic and state transitions
控制逻辑和状态转换的数学验证
Simulation Testing · 仿真测试
Digital twin validation across operational scenarios
跨运营场景的数字孪生验证
Physical Prototyping · 物理原型
Component-level testing and integration validation
组件级测试和集成验证
Scenario Validation · 场景验证
Real-world context testing with defined parameters
具有明确参数的真实场景测试
Current Status · 当前状态
Phase 1: Complete · 阶段1：完成
Theoretical framework established
理论框架已建立
Phase 2: In Progress · 阶段2：进行中
Simulation and modeling active
仿真和建模进行中
Phase 3: Planned · 阶段3：计划中
Physical prototyping preparation
物理原型准备
Phase 4: Future · 阶段4：未来
Scenario deployment validation
场景部署验证

Validation Timeline: 2024-2027 · 验证时间线：2024-2027
System validation requires 3-4 years of rigorous testing before deployment readiness.
系统验证需要 3-4 年的严格测试才能准备部署。
This timeline reflects the complexity of tri-modal integration and the importance of safety validation.
此时间线反映了三栖整合的复杂性和安全验证的重要性。
Academia 学术界
Academic & Research Collaboration · 学术与研究合作
Flux3 is an open system-level research initiative exploring tri-modal mobility architecture. Academic collaboration focuses on theoretical validation and system engineering research.
Flux3 是一个探索三栖流动架构的开放系统级研究项目。学术合作专注于理论验证和系统工程研究。
Research Focus Areas · 研究重点领域
Control Systems Architecture · 控制系统架构
Unified logic for multi-modal state transitions
多模态状态转换的统一逻辑
Energy Management · 能源管理
Cross-domain power distribution and optimization
跨域电力分配与优化
Safety Frameworks · 安全框架
Validation protocols for mode transitions
模式转换的验证协议
System Integration · 系统集成
Interface architecture and component coordination
接口架构与组件协调
Collaboration Benefits · 合作优势
For Universities · 大学获益
  • Novel research domain · 新颖研究领域
  • Publication opportunities · 发表机会
  • Real-world validation context · 真实验证场景
For System Builders · 系统构建者获益
  • Theoretical rigor · 理论严谨性
  • Academic validation · 学术验证
  • Research network access · 研究网络接入
For Technical Contributors · 技术贡献者获益
  • Skill development · 技能发展
  • Open-source portfolio · 开源作品集
  • Collaborative learning · 协作学习
For Crowdfunding Supporters · 众筹支持者获益
  • System transparency · 系统透明度
  • Community participation · 社区参与
  • Validation progress visibility · 验证进展可见性
For Investors · 投资者获益
  • Early system insight · 早期系统洞察
  • Strategic positioning · 战略定位
  • Network effects · 网络效应
For Industry & Cities · 行业与城市获益
  • Scenario validation opportunities · 场景验证机会
  • Infrastructure optimization insights · 基础设施优化洞察
  • Early adoption positioning · 早期采用定位
  • Operational efficiency gains · 运营效率提升
Engagement Model · 参与模式
Research Proposal · 研究提案
Define scope and objectives
定义范围和目标
Collaborative Work · 协作工作
Joint research and validation
联合研究与验证
Publication & Sharing · 发表与分享
Open dissemination of findings
研究成果开放传播

Open Research Principle · 开放研究原则
All research findings are published openly. No proprietary restrictions. Academic freedom is maintained throughout collaboration.
所有研究成果公开发表。无专有限制。整个合作过程中保持学术自由。
Research Directions · 研究方向
1
Multi-Modal Control Systems · 多模态控制系统
Investigation of unified control frameworks that enable seamless transitions between operational states. Research emphasis on control theory extensions that accommodate discontinuous dynamics and state-dependent constraints without requiring mode-specific control architectures.
研究支持运行状态间无缝转换的统一控制框架。研究重点是适应不连续动力学和状态相关约束的控制理论扩展，无需特定模式控制架构。
2
Digital Twin & System Simulation · 数字孪生与系统仿真
Development of high-fidelity simulation environments that capture cross-domain interaction effects. Research focus on computational methods for real-time system state estimation and predictive modeling across multiple operational regimes simultaneously.
开发捕获跨领域交互效应的高保真仿真环境。研究重点是同时跨多个运行体制的实时系统状态估计和预测建模的计算方法。
3
Energy Management & Optimization · 能源管理与优化
Analysis of energy distribution strategies for systems operating across varying power demand profiles. Research contribution to optimization algorithms that balance immediate operational requirements with long-term energy availability constraints.
分析跨不同功率需求配置文件运行的系统的能源分配策略。研究对平衡即时运行需求与长期能源可用性约束的优化算法的贡献。
4
Safety, Redundancy & Fault Tolerance · 安全、冗余与容错
Exploration of safety architecture patterns for systems with dynamically changing operational envelopes. Research emphasis on formal verification methods and redundancy strategies that maintain safety properties during state transitions.
探索具有动态变化运行范围的系统的安全架构。研究重点是在状态转换期间保持安全属性的形式验证方法和冗余策略。
5
Human–System Interaction · 人机交互
Investigation of interface design principles for systems with multiple operational modes. Research focus on cognitive load management and situational awareness maintenance across operational state changes.
研究具有多种运行模式的系统的接口设计原则。研究重点是跨运行状态变化的认知负荷管理和情境意识维持。
ETH Zurich 苏黎世联邦理工学院
Academic Alignment & References
学术对齐与参考

Flux3 aligns with ongoing academic research directions from leading institutions, including ETH Zurich and other global universities. References are provided for research context and direction alignment only. No institutional endorsement, sponsorship, or formal partnership is implied unless explicitly stated.
Flux3 在研究方向上参考并对齐包括苏黎世联邦理工学院(ETH Zurich)在内的高校研究路径。相关引用仅用于研究背景与方向对齐说明。除非明确声明,否则不构成任何机构背书、赞助或正式合作关系。
The relationship between Flux3 and academic institutions operates through research direction alignment rather than formal institutional agreements. Flux3 system architecture development draws on publicly available research literature and methodological frameworks published by scholars at leading universities. These references inform system design decisions and identify relevant problem spaces, but do not constitute endorsements or collaborative arrangements unless separately documented through formal research agreements.
Flux3 与学术机构之间的关系通过研究方向对齐而非正式机构协议运作。Flux3 系统架构开发借鉴领先大学学者发布的公开可用文献和方法论框架。这些引用为设计决策提供信息并识别相关问题空间,但除非通过正式研究协议单独记录,否则不构成背书或合作安排。
Research Context
研究背景
ETH Zurich maintains world-leading research programs in autonomous systems, control theory, and multi-modal robotics. Flux3 system architecture questions intersect with ongoing research in these domains, particularly work examining coordination frameworks for heterogeneous robotic systems and control strategies for platforms operating across multiple physical regimes.
苏黎世联邦理工学院在自主系统、控制理论和多模态机器人技术方面保持世界领先的研究项目。Flux3 系统架构问题与这些领域的持续研究交叉，特别是研究异构机器人系统的协调框架以及跨多个物理体制运行平台的控制策略。
The alignment between Flux3 development priorities and ETH research directions enables mutual benefit through shared problem space exploration. Academic research groups gain access to system-level integration challenges that extend beyond laboratory-scale demonstrations, while Flux3 benefits from rigorous theoretical frameworks and validation methodologies developed in academic contexts.
Flux3 的开发重点与 ETH 的研究方向对齐，通过共享问题空间探索实现互利。学术研究小组能够接触到超越实验室规模演示的系统级集成挑战，而 Flux3 则受益于学术背景下开发的严谨理论框架和验证方法论。
Academic Contribution
学术贡献
By engaging with established academic research, Flux3 aims to contribute to practical applications of advanced control theory and robotic systems. Our work can provide valuable empirical data and real-world implementation challenges to academic partners, fostering a synergistic relationship that advances both theoretical understanding and technological deployment.
通过参与已建立的学术研究，Flux3 旨在为先进控制理论和机器人系统的实际应用做出贡献。我们的工作可以为学术伙伴提供有价值的实证数据和实际实施挑战，从而促进理论理解和技术部署的协同关系。
This collaboration model is designed to accelerate innovation in fields critical to Flux3's mission, ensuring that our solutions are not only cutting-edge but also rigorously grounded in scientific principles.
这种协作模式旨在加速对 Flux3 使命至关重要的领域的创新，确保我们的解决方案不仅是最先进的，而且是严格基于科学原理的。
ETH Zurich Reference Links · ETH Zurich 参考链接
The following links provide access to relevant research groups and publications at ETH Zurich. These resources inform Flux3 system architecture development and identify potential areas for research collaboration.
以下链接提供对 ETH Zurich 相关研究小组和出版物的访问。这些资源为 Flux3 系统架构开发提供信息并识别研究合作的潜在领域。
Autonomous Systems Lab
自主系统实验室
Research focus: Multi-robot systems, autonomous navigation, sensor fusion
研究重点:多机器人系统、自主导航、传感器融合
Link placeholder: [Official ETH ASL webpage]
链接占位符:[ETH ASL 官方网页]
Dynamic Systems & Control
动态系统与控制
Research focus: Model predictive control, optimization, system identification
研究重点:模型预测控制、优化、系统识别
Link placeholder: [Official ETH IDSC webpage]
链接占位符:[ETH IDSC 官方网页]
Robotics Systems Lab
机器人系统实验室
Research focus: Legged locomotion, mobile manipulation, terrain interaction
研究重点:腿式运动、移动操纵、地形交互
Link placeholder: [Official ETH RSL webpage]
链接占位符:[ETH RSL 官方网页]

These references are provided for informational purposes. Flux3 does not claim institutional affiliation or endorsement from ETH Zurich unless explicitly documented through formal research agreements. Researchers interested in collaboration should initiate contact through appropriate academic channels.
提供这些引用仅供参考。除非通过正式研究协议明确记录,否则 Flux3 不声称与 ETH Zurich 的机构隶属或背书。有兴趣合作的研究人员应通过适当的学术渠道发起联系。
Collaboration Forms · 合作形式
Academic collaboration with Flux3 operates through multiple engagement mechanisms, each designed to accommodate different institutional requirements and research objectives. These forms maintain alignment with academic timelines and publication norms while enabling meaningful contribution to system development.
与 Flux3 的学术合作通过多种参与机制运作,每种机制旨在适应不同的机构要求和研究目标。这些形式与学术时间表和出版规范保持一致,同时支持对系统开发的有意义贡献。
Joint Research Exploration
联合研究探索
Collaborative investigation of specific system architecture questions through shared research protocols. This form emphasizes co-definition of research questions and mutual contribution to methodological development.
通过共享研究协议对特定系统架构问题进行协作调查。这种形式强调研究问题的共同定义和对方法论的相互贡献。
Open Publication & Prototype Sharing
开放出版与原型共享
Release of research findings through conventional academic channels with full attribution. Prototype implementations and datasets generated through collaboration are shared openly to enable independent verification and extension.
通过传统学术渠道发布研究成果,并完全归属。通过合作生成的原型实现和数据集公开共享,以支持独立验证和扩展。
Open-Source Contributions
开源贡献
Direct contribution to Flux3 system modules through open-source development frameworks. Academic contributors maintain attribution and intellectual property rights over methodological innovations while participating in system integration efforts.
通过开源开发框架直接贡献 Flux3 系统模块。学术贡献者在参与系统集成工作的同时,保持对方法论创新的归属和知识产权。
Academic Workshops & Discussions
学术研讨会与讨论
Regular technical exchanges focused on specific system architecture challenges. Workshops provide forums for presenting preliminary findings, receiving feedback, and identifying new research directions emerging from system development.
专注于特定系统架构挑战的定期技术交流。研讨会提供展示初步发现、接收反馈和识别系统开发中出现的新研究方向的论坛。
Co-Building · 共同建设
Open Co-Building & Technical Roadmap · 开放共建与技术路线图
Flux3 is not hiring employees here. We invite co-builders to contribute to specific modules within clear boundaries.
Flux3 在这里不招全职员工。我们邀请共建者在清晰边界内参与模块构建。

The co-building framework distinguishes between employment and modular contribution. Traditional employment relationships involve ongoing obligations, hierarchical management structures, and comprehensive control over work products.
共建框架区分雇佣和模块化贡献。传统雇佣关系涉及持续义务、层级管理结构和对工作产品的全面控制。
Flux3 co-building operates through defined task scopes, milestone-based deliverables, and attribution-based recognition rather than conventional employment arrangements.
Flux3 共建通过定义的任务范围、基于里程碑的交付物和基于归属的认可运作，而非传统雇佣安排。
This structural distinction enables participation patterns that accommodate diverse contributor contexts. Engineers may contribute to specific modules while maintaining primary employment elsewhere. Students and researchers can participate in system development without conflicting with academic commitments. Independent contributors engage with defined scopes that clarify intellectual property boundaries and attribution protocols from the outset.
这种结构区分支持适应不同贡献者背景的参与模式。工程师可以在保持主要雇佣关系的同时贡献特定模块。学生和研究人员可以参与系统开发而不与学术承诺冲突。独立贡献者从一开始就参与明确知识产权边界和归属协议的定义范围。
Phases Roadmap 阶段路线图
System development proceeds through four sequential phases, each establishing foundations for subsequent work. Phase boundaries represent validation checkpoints where architectural decisions are evaluated before committing to dependent development efforts. This structure enables iterative refinement while maintaining forward progress toward integrated system validation.
系统开发通过四个连续阶段进行，每个阶段都为后续工作奠定基础。阶段边界代表验证检查点，在承诺相关的开发工作之前，对架构决策进行评估。这种结构实现了迭代优化，同时保持朝着集成系统验证的方向前进。
1
Phase 0
阶段 0
System Modeling & Simulation
系统建模与仿真
Establish digital twin frameworks, define simulation environments, validate architectural assumptions through computational modeling. Deliverables include system architecture documentation, simulation platforms, and initial validation results demonstrating logical coherence.
建立数字孪生框架，定义仿真环境，通过计算建模验证架构假设。交付物包括系统架构文档、仿真平台和展示逻辑连贯性的初始验证结果。
2
Phase 1
阶段 1
Control Logic Definition
控制逻辑定义
Implement unified control frameworks, develop state transition algorithms, establish safety boundaries within simulation. Deliverables include control system specifications, transition logic implementations, and simulated operational demonstrations.
实施统一控制框架，开发状态转换算法，在仿真中建立安全边界。交付物包括控制系统规范、转换逻辑实现和仿真运行演示。
3
Phase 2
阶段 2
Multi-Modal Transition Mechanisms
多模态切换机制
Design physical mechanisms enabling operational state changes, validate transition sequences, optimize energy efficiency across modes. Deliverables include mechanism designs, transition validation data, and integration specifications.
设计实现运行状态变化的物理机制，验证转换序列，优化跨模式的能源效率。交付物包括机制设计、转换验证数据和集成规格。
4
Phase 3
阶段 3
Safety & Validation
安全验证
Implement redundancy architectures, conduct failure mode analysis, validate safety properties through comprehensive testing. Deliverables include safety architecture documentation, test protocols, and validation certification readiness assessments.
实施冗余架构，进行故障模式分析，通过全面测试验证安全属性。交付物包括安全架构文档、测试协议和验证认证准备度评估。
Open Modules · 开放模块
System development is organized into discrete modules, each addressing specific architectural layers or functional requirements. Modules maintain defined interfaces and dependencies, enabling parallel development while ensuring integration coherence. Contributors select modules aligned with their technical expertise and interest areas.
系统开发组织为离散模块，每个模块处理特定的架构层或功能需求。模块保持定义的接口和依赖关系，支持并行开发，同时确保集成连贯性。贡献者选择与其技术专长和兴趣领域对齐的模块。
Digital Twin & Simulation
数字孪生与仿真
Development of high-fidelity simulation environments that capture system dynamics across operational states. Work includes physics modeling, real-time simulation optimization, and visualization frameworks.
开发捕获跨运行状态系统动力学的高保真仿真环境。工作包括物理建模、实时仿真优化和可视化框架。
Control Logic
控制逻辑
Implementation of unified control frameworks and state transition algorithms. Contributors work on control theory applications, algorithm optimization, and controller validation.
实施统一控制框架和状态转换算法。贡献者从事控制理论应用、算法优化和控制器验证工作。
Energy Management
能源管理
Design of power distribution strategies and energy optimization algorithms. Work encompasses battery management systems, power flow modeling, and efficiency optimization.
设计功率分配策略和能源优化算法。工作涵盖电池管理系统、功率流建模和效率优化。
Safety & Redundancy
安全与冗余
Development of fault-tolerant architectures and safety validation frameworks. Contributors focus on redundancy design, failure mode analysis, and safety certification preparation.
开发容错架构和安全验证框架。贡献者专注于冗余设计、故障模式分析和安全认证准备。
Visualization Interface
可视化界面
Creation of system monitoring and control interfaces. Work includes dashboard design, data visualization, and human-system interaction optimization.
创建系统监控和控制接口。工作包括仪表板设计、数据可视化和人机交互优化。
Co-Building Infrastructure Links · 共建基础设施链接
Technical infrastructure for co-building is organized through open-source platforms and collaborative tools. These resources provide access to system documentation, development repositories, and community coordination channels.
共建技术基础设施通过开源平台和协作工具组织。这些资源提供对系统文档、开发仓库和社区协调渠道的访问。
GitHub Repository
GitHub 仓库
Central code repository for system modules and documentation
系统模块和文档的中央代码仓库
Link placeholder: [GitHub organization URL]
链接占位符:[GitHub 组织 URL]
Technical Documentation
技术文档
System architecture specifications, API references, contribution guidelines
系统架构规范、API 参考、贡献指南
Link placeholder: [Documentation portal URL]
链接占位符:[文档门户 URL]
Community Channel
社区频道
Real-time coordination platform for technical discussions and collaboration
用于技术讨论和协作的实时协调平台
Link placeholder: [Discord/Slack workspace URL]
链接占位符:[Discord/Slack 工作区 URL]

All co-building activities operate under open-source licensing frameworks that ensure contributor attribution and clarify intellectual property boundaries.
所有共建活动在开源许可框架下运作，确保贡献者归属并明确知识产权边界。
Specific license terms vary by module based on technical requirements and integration dependencies. Contributors retain rights to their methodological innovations while granting usage permissions necessary for system integration.
具体许可条款根据技术要求和集成依赖关系按模块变化。贡献者保留其方法论创新的权利，同时授予系统集成所需的使用权限。
Tasks 任务
Tasks · 任务
All tasks are modular, milestone-based, and contribution-recorded. System definition authority remains centralized; module creativity is encouraged.
所有任务均模块化、基于里程碑并记录贡献。系统定义权限保持集中；鼓励模块创造力。
Task Structure
任务结构
Tasks represent discrete units of system development work with defined scopes, deliverables, and completion criteria. Each task connects to specific system modules and development phases, ensuring contributions integrate coherently with overall architecture.
任务代表具有明确范围、交付物和完成标准的离散系统开发工作单元。每个任务连接到特定的系统模块和开发阶段，确保贡献与整体架构连贯集成。
The task framework maintains a critical distinction between system-level authority and module-level creativity. Architectural decisions, interface specifications, and integration requirements remain centrally defined to ensure system coherence. Within these boundaries, contributors exercise full creative freedom in implementation approaches, optimization strategies, and technical solutions.
任务框架在系统级权威和模块级创造力之间保持关键区别。架构决策、接口规范和集成需求保持集中定义，以确保系统连贯性。在这些边界内，贡献者在实施方法、优化策略和技术解决方案中行使完全创造自由。
Milestone structures break larger development objectives into verifiable increments. Each milestone represents a validation checkpoint where progress is assessed against defined criteria before proceeding to dependent work. This approach enables early identification of integration issues and supports iterative refinement based on intermediate results.
里程碑结构将更大的开发目标分解为可验证的增量。每个里程碑代表一个验证检查点，在进行依赖工作之前根据定义标准评估进度。该方法支持早期识别集成问题并基于中间结果支持迭代完善。
任务结构
任务代表具有定义范围、交付物和完成标准的离散系统开发工作单元。每个任务连接到特定模块和开发阶段，确保贡献与整体架构连贯集成。
任务框架在系统级权威和模块级创造力之间保持关键区别。架构决策、接口规范和集成需求保持集中定义，以确保系统连贯性。在这些边界内，贡献者在实施方法、优化策略和技术解决方案中行使完全创造自由。
里程碑结构将更大的开发目标分解为可验证的增量。每个里程碑代表一个验证检查点，在进行依赖工作之前根据定义标准评估进度。该方法支持早期识别集成问题并基于中间结果支持迭代完善。
01
Task Publication
任务发布
Tasks are posted with complete specifications including objectives, deliverables, milestones, and recognition terms
任务发布时包含完整规范，包括目标、交付物、里程碑和认可条款
02
Contributor Selection
贡献者选择
Contributors propose approaches and demonstrate relevant capabilities before task assignment
贡献者在任务分配前提出方法并展示相关能力
03
Milestone Validation
里程碑验证
Progress is evaluated at defined checkpoints against technical and integration criteria
在定义的检查点根据技术和集成标准评估进度
04
Contribution Recording
贡献记录
Completed work is documented with full attribution and integrated into system repositories
完成的工作记录完整归属并集成到系统仓库
Task Posting Template · 任务发布模板
All tasks are modular, milestone-based, and contribution-recorded. System definition authority remains centralized; module creativity is encouraged. 所有任务均为模块化、里程碑制,并记录贡献。系统定义权集中管理;模块内鼓励创造。

TASK POSTING TEMPLATE
任务发布模板

Version:
版本:
Task ID: [Unique identifier]
任务ID: [唯一标识符]
Module Name: [System module this task contributes to]
模块名称: [此任务贡献的系统模块]
Objective: [Clear statement of what this task accomplishes]
目标: [此任务完成内容的清晰声明]
Expected Deliverables: [Specific outputs required for task completion]
预期交付物: [任务完成所需的具体输出]
Milestones: [Intermediate checkpoints with validation criteria]
里程碑: [带验证标准的中间检查点]
Open / Closed Source: [License terms and code sharing requirements]
开源/闭源: [许可条款和代码共享要求]
Recognition: [Attribution protocols and contribution recording]
认可: [归属协议和贡献记录]
Honorarium (if applicable): [Compensation details if offered]
酬金 (如适用): [提供的补偿详情]
Timeline: [Expected duration and deadline]
时间表: [预期持续时间和截止日期]
Contact / Submission: [Communication channel and deliverable submission process]
联系/提交: [沟通渠道和交付物提交流程]
Contribution Record Template · 贡献记录模板
All contributions are documented using standardized recording templates that ensure proper attribution and enable future reference. These records serve as verifiable evidence of participation and provide the foundation for building reputation within the co-building community. 所有贡献使用标准化记录模板记录,确保适当归属并为在共建社区内建立声誉提供基础。

CONTRIBUTION RECORD TEMPLATE · 贡献记录模板

Contributor Name: [Full name or handle] · 贡献者姓名: [全名或昵称]
Affiliation (Optional): [University, organization, or independent] · 所属机构(可选): [大学、组织或独立]
Module: [System module contributed to] · 模块: [贡献的系统模块]
Contribution Summary: [Brief description of work completed] · 贡献总结: [完成工作的简要描述]
Date: [Completion date] · 日期: [完成日期]
License / Agreement: [Applicable license terms] · 许可/协议: [适用的许可条款]
Public Reference Link: [URL to code, documentation, or published work] · 公共参考链接: [代码、文档或已发布作品的URL]
Contribution records are maintained in public repositories and linked from contributor profiles. This transparency enables verification of participation history and facilitates appropriate recognition when contributors reference their work in professional contexts. Records remain permanently accessible and cannot be removed or modified without contributor consent. 贡献记录保存在公共仓库中并从贡献者档案链接。这种透明度支持验证参与历史,并在贡献者在专业背景下引用其工作时促进适当认可。未经贡献者同意,记录将永久可访问,且不能删除或修改。
Support · 支持
Crowdfunding · System Validation Support · 众筹 · 系统验证支持
Crowdfunding supports system validation, not product sales. Support is not investment; no financial returns are promised.
众筹支持系统验证，而非产品销售。支持并非投资；不承诺任何财务回报。

This distinction is fundamental and legally significant. Crowdfunding participation does not constitute equity investment, debt financing, or any form of securities purchase. Supporters receive no ownership stake, profit participation, or financial return expectations. Support enables system development work without creating investor relationships or return obligations.
这种区别是根本性的且具有法律意义。众筹参与不构成股权投资、债务融资或任何形式的证券购买。支持者不获得所有权、利润参与或财务回报期望。支持使系统开发工作成为可能，而不创建投资者关系或回报义务。
The crowdfunding model addresses a specific challenge in system-level research and development: funding work that generates public goods rather than proprietary products. Traditional investment frameworks assume eventual commercialization and return generation. System validation work, particularly at early architectural stages, produces knowledge, methodologies, and open-source artifacts that benefit broad communities rather than generating capturable value for specific entities.
众筹模式解决了系统级研究和开发中的一个特定挑战：资助那些产生公共产品而非专有产品的工作。传统的投资框架假设最终的商业化和回报生成。系统验证工作，尤其是在早期架构阶段，产生知识、方法论和开源产物，这些惠及广泛社区，而不是为特定实体创造可捕获的价值。
Supporters participate in enabling this work not for financial gain but to advance system-level understanding that may eventually enable new capabilities. This participation model aligns incentives with public good generation rather than value capture, enabling development approaches that prioritize architectural coherence and methodological rigor over rapid commercialization timelines.
支持者参与这项工作并非为了经济利益，而是为了促进系统级理解，这种理解最终可能催生新的能力。这种参与模式将激励与公共产品生成而非价值捕获对齐，从而支持那些优先考虑架构一致性和方法严谨性，而非快速商业化时间表的开发方法。
Use of Funds · 资金使用
Crowdfunding resources are allocated to specific categories of system development work. All expenditures are documented transparently and reported regularly to the supporter community. This accountability framework ensures funds are deployed consistent with stated objectives and enables supporters to verify appropriate resource utilization.
众筹资源分配给系统开发工作的特定类别。所有支出透明记录并定期向支持者社区报告。这种问责框架确保资金部署与既定目标一致，并使支持者能够验证适当的资源利用。
Simulation & Digital Twin
模拟与数字孪生
Development of computational infrastructure for system modeling and validation. Includes simulation platform development, physics engine integration, and visualization frameworks. These tools enable architectural validation before physical implementation, reducing development risk and iteration costs.
开发用于系统建模和验证的计算基础设施。包括仿真平台开发、物理引擎集成和可视化框架。这些工具在物理实施之前支持架构验证，降低开发风险和迭代成本。
Co-Building Infrastructure
共建基础设施
Platforms and tools supporting distributed collaboration. Includes repository hosting, documentation systems, communication infrastructure, and coordination platforms. This infrastructure enables global participation while maintaining development coherence.
支持分布式协作的平台和工具。包括仓库托管、文档系统、通信基础设施和协调平台。此基础设施支持全球参与，同时保持开发连贯性。
Module Incentives
模块激励
Task-based honoraria for specific technical contributions. Not employment compensation but recognition payments for defined deliverables. Enables participation from contributors who cannot volunteer time but whose expertise is valuable for system development.
针对特定技术贡献的基于任务的酬金。不是雇佣补偿，而是对定义交付物的认可支付。支持无法志愿时间但其专业知识对系统开发有价值的贡献者参与。
Documentation & Transparency
文档与透明度
Resources dedicated to maintaining comprehensive documentation of system development, financial reporting, and community communication. Transparency infrastructure itself requires sustained investment to maintain accountability standards.
用于维护系统开发、财务报告和社区沟通综合文档的专用资源。透明度基础设施本身需要持续投资以保持问责标准。
Support Levels · 支持级别
Support participation is structured across multiple levels to accommodate diverse contribution capacities and engagement preferences. Each level provides distinct forms of access and recognition while maintaining the fundamental principle that no level constitutes investment or entitles supporters to financial returns.
支持参与在多个级别上构建，以适应不同的贡献能力和参与偏好。每个级别提供不同形式的访问和认可，同时保持根本原则，即没有级别构成投资或使支持者有权获得财务回报。
1
Observer
观察者
Access to public development updates, technical documentation, and community discussions. Observer status provides transparency into system development progress without requiring active participation. Suitable for individuals interested in following system evolution but not seeking direct involvement.
访问公共开发更新、技术文档和社区讨论。观察者身份提供了系统开发进度的透明度，无需积极参与。适用于对关注系统演变感兴趣但不寻求直接参与的个人。
2
Contributor
贡献者
Recognition as active supporter with access to detailed technical discussions, early access to simulation environments, and invitation to community events. This level acknowledges meaningful support enabling specific development activities.
作为积极支持者的认可，可访问详细的技术讨论、早期接触仿真环境以及受邀参加社区活动。该级别认可了对特定开发活动的有意义支持。
3
Early Supporter
早期支持者
Enhanced recognition including public attribution in system documentation, priority access to technical resources, and participation in strategic discussions about system direction. This level acknowledges substantial support enabling sustained development capacity.
增强认可，包括在系统文档中公开署名、优先访问技术资源以及参与关于系统方向的战略讨论。该级别认可了支持持续开发能力的实质性支持。
4
System Supporter
系统支持者
Comprehensive engagement including deep technical access, advisory input on architecture decisions, and recognition as foundational supporter. This level acknowledges exceptional support that significantly impacts system development trajectory.
全面参与，包括深度技术访问、对架构决策的咨询意见以及作为基础支持者的认可。该级别认可了对系统开发轨迹产生重大影响的卓越支持。

Support level benefits focus on access, recognition, and participation rather than economic returns. No level provides ownership rights, profit sharing, or financial instruments. Benefits may be modified as system development progresses and community needs evolve.
支持级别利益专注于访问、认可和参与，而非经济回报。没有级别提供所有权、利润分享或金融工具。随着系统开发进展和社区需求演变，利益可能会修改。
Industry · 行业
Industry & Scenario Integration · 行业与场景整合
Flux3 explores scenario-based validation without entering procurement or sales processes.
Flux3 以场景验证为主,不进入采购或销售流程。
Industry engagement operates through scenario exploration rather than product acquisition. Traditional vendor-customer relationships involve product specifications, purchasing agreements, deployment commitments, and ongoing support obligations. Flux3 industry interaction maintains clear boundaries that prevent these conventional commercial dynamics from emerging prematurely.
行业参与通过场景探索而非产品获取运作。传统供应商-客户关系涉及产品规范、采购协议、部署承诺和持续支持义务。Flux3 行业互动保持明确边界,防止这些传统商业动力过早出现。
Scenario-based validation enables system testing in realistic operational contexts without requiring deployment commitments or commercial agreements. Industry partners provide use case definitions, operational constraints, and validation environments. Flux3 develops experimental implementations that address scenario requirements within system architecture boundaries. This interaction generates valuable validation data and identifies integration challenges while maintaining research-oriented relationships rather than commercial partnerships.
基于场景的验证支持在现实运行背景下进行系统测试,无需部署承诺或商业协议。行业合作伙伴提供用例定义、运行约束和验证环境。Flux3 开发解决系统架构边界内场景需求的实验实现。这种互动产生有价值的验证数据并识别集成挑战,同时保持面向研究的关系而非商业伙伴关系。
Scenario Examples · 场景示例
The following scenarios illustrate potential application contexts where tri-modal mobility capabilities address specific operational challenges. These examples serve as validation targets rather than committed deployments. Each scenario enables testing of different system capabilities under varied constraint sets.
以下场景说明了三栖移动能力解决特定运行挑战的潜在应用背景。这些示例作为验证目标而非承诺部署。每个场景支持在不同约束集下测试不同系统能力。
Emergency Response · 应急响应
Rapid deployment across varied terrain during disaster scenarios. Tests transition capabilities between ground, water, and low-altitude states under time-critical conditions. Validates safety systems and energy management under high-stress operational parameters.
灾难场景期间跨不同地形的快速部署。在时间关键条件下测试地面、水面和低空状态之间的转换能力。在高压力运行参数下验证安全系统和能源管理。
Complex Environment Logistics · 复杂环境物流
Material transport through terrain that combines ground-accessible, water-based, and aerial pathway segments. Tests route optimization algorithms and energy efficiency across extended multi-modal journeys. Validates interface consistency across operational state changes.
通过结合地面可达、水基和空中路径段的地形进行物资运输。测试跨扩展多模态旅程的路线优化算法和能源效率。验证跨运行状态变化的接口一致性。
Regional Mobility Exploration · 区域移动性探索
Investigation of tri-modal capabilities for connecting communities across challenging geography. Tests system performance in scenarios combining urban, rural, and undeveloped terrain types. Validates control system adaptability across diverse operational conditions.
调查跨具有挑战性地理连接社区的三栖能力。在结合城市、农村和未开发地形类型的场景中测试系统性能。验证跨不同运行条件的控制系统适应性。
Engagement Process · 参与流程
Industry scenario engagement follows a structured process that maintains boundaries between research validation and commercial deployment. This framework ensures productive collaboration while preventing premature commercialization pressures that could compromise system development rigor.
行业场景参与遵循结构化流程,在研究验证和商业部署之间保持边界。此框架确保富有成效的协作,同时防止可能损害系统开发严谨性的过早商业化压力。
1
Scenario Proposal
场景提案
Industry partners describe operational contexts where tri-modal capabilities might address specific challenges
行业合作伙伴描述三栖能力可能解决特定挑战的运行背景
2
Joint Validation Design
联合验证设计
Collaborative development of validation frameworks that test relevant system capabilities within scenario constraints
协作开发在场景约束内测试相关系统能力的验证框架
3
Data & Feedback Loop
数据与反馈循环
Systematic collection of validation results and operational insights that inform system refinement
系统收集为系统完善提供信息的验证结果和运行洞察

Scenario engagement does not constitute commitment to product delivery, deployment timelines, or commercial availability. Validation results inform system development priorities but do not obligate specific feature implementations or operational capabilities. Industry partners participate as research collaborators rather than customers.
场景参与不构成对产品交付、部署时间表或商业可用性的承诺。验证结果为系统开发优先级提供信息,但不强制特定功能实现或运行能力。行业合作伙伴作为研究合作者而非客户参与。
Investors · 投资者
System-Level Participation · 系统级参与
Flux3 is at system validation stage. This page is not a financing round announcement.
Flux3 处于系统验证阶段。本页不是融资轮公告。

The absence of active fundraising does not reflect capital availability but rather developmental stage appropriateness. System-level validation work precedes the conditions that make conventional investment frameworks applicable. Current activities focus on architectural coherence and technical feasibility rather than market positioning or revenue generation.
缺乏积极筹款不反映资本可用性,而是发展阶段适当性。系统级验证工作先于使传统投资框架适用的条件。当前活动专注于架构连贯性和技术可行性,而非市场定位或收入生成。
Investment-oriented stakeholders engage with Flux3 not through capital deployment but through judgment frameworks and structural participation. This distinction reflects fundamental differences between validation-stage system development and investment-ready ventures. Traditional venture investment assumes defined products, addressable markets, and credible paths to revenue generation. Flux3 currently operates in a different modality focused on establishing architectural foundations that may eventually enable such commercial frameworks.
以投资为导向的利益相关方通过判断框架和结构参与而非资本部署与 Flux3 接触。这种区别反映了验证阶段系统开发与投资就绪企业之间的根本差异。传统风险投资假设定义的产品、可寻址市场和可信的收入生成路径。Flux3 目前以不同方式运作,专注于建立最终可能支持此类商业框架的架构基础。
Current Reality · 当前现实
Development Stage
开发阶段
System validation prioritizes architectural coherence over market readiness. Current work establishes whether the tri-modal concept can be implemented with sufficient safety, efficiency, and reliability to warrant further development. These questions must be resolved before market analysis, business model definition, or investment structuring become relevant activities.
系统验证优先考虑架构连贯性而非市场准备度。当前工作确定三栖概念是否可以以足够的安全性、效率和可靠性实施,以保证进一步开发。这些问题必须在市场分析、商业模式定义或投资结构成为相关活动之前解决。
The validation phase timeline is determined by technical milestones rather than funding cycles or market windows. Progress measures include simulation fidelity, control system stability, safety validation completeness, and integration coherence. These metrics differ fundamentally from the customer acquisition, revenue growth, and market penetration indicators that guide investment decisions in commercial ventures.
验证阶段时间表由技术里程碑而非融资周期或市场窗口决定。进度衡量包括仿真保真度、控制系统稳定性、安全验证完整性和集成连贯性。这些指标与指导商业企业投资决策的客户获取、收入增长和市场渗透指标根本不同。
Development Stage
开发阶段
System validation prioritizes architectural coherence over market readiness. Current work establishes whether the tri-modal concept can be implemented with sufficient safety, efficiency, and reliability to warrant further development. These questions must be resolved before market analysis, business model definition, or investment structuring become relevant activities.
系统验证优先考虑架构连贯性而非市场准备度。当前工作确定三栖概念是否可以以足够的安全性、效率和可靠性实施,以保证进一步开发。这些问题必须在市场分析、商业模式定义或投资结构成为相关活动之前解决。
The validation phase timeline is determined by technical milestones rather than funding cycles or market windows. Progress measures include simulation fidelity, control system stability, safety validation completeness, and integration coherence. These metrics differ fundamentally from the customer acquisition, revenue growth, and market penetration indicators that guide investment decisions in commercial ventures.
验证阶段时间表由技术里程碑而非融资周期或市场窗口决定。进度衡量包括仿真保真度、控制系统稳定性、安全验证完整性和集成连贯性。这些指标与指导商业企业投资决策的客户获取、收入增长和市场渗透指标根本不同。
0
Funding Rounds
融资轮次
No active financing processes
无活跃融资流程
0
Revenue
收入
No commercial operations
无商业运营
100%
Validation Focus
验证重点
Pure system development
纯系统开发
Participation Roles · 参与角色
Investment-oriented stakeholders contribute to Flux3 through three distinct roles that emphasize judgment, structure, and connection over capital deployment. These roles acknowledge that value creation at system validation stages derives from strategic insight and relationship development rather than financial resources alone.
以投资为导向的利益相关方通过三个不同角色为 Flux3 做出贡献,强调判断、结构和连接而非资本部署。这些角色承认系统验证阶段的价值创造源于战略洞察和关系发展,而非仅仅是财务资源。
System-Level Judgment
系统级判断
Assessment of whether tri-modal mobility represents a viable system architecture direction. This judgment requires understanding both technical feasibility and potential ecosystem implications. Participants contribute strategic perspective on whether architectural assumptions align with broader mobility infrastructure evolution trajectories.
评估三栖移动是否代表可行的系统架构方向。这种判断需要理解技术可行性度和潜在生态系统影响。参与者贡献关于架构假设是否与更广泛的移动基础设施演变轨迹对齐的战略视角。
Structural Collaboration
结构性协作
Participation in defining frameworks that enable system development beyond individual organizational capacities. This role addresses governance structures, intellectual property arrangements, and coordination mechanisms that support distributed co-building while maintaining system coherence.
参与定义支持超越单个组织能力的系统开发的框架。此角色处理治理结构、知识产权安排和支持分布式共建同时保持系统连贯性的协调机制。
Ecosystem Connection
生态系统连接
Facilitation of relationships between Flux3 development and relevant stakeholders in mobility, energy, technology, and regulatory domains. Connection roles leverage existing networks to identify collaboration opportunities, validation scenarios, and expertise sources that accelerate system development.
促进 Flux3 开发与移动、能源、技术和监管领域相关利益相关方之间的关系。连接角色利用现有网络识别加速系统开发的合作机会、验证场景和专业知识来源。
Private Contact · System Discussion · 私密联系 · 系统讨论
Request a 20-minute system discussion (private channel).申请 20 分钟系统讨论(私密通道)。
Strategic discussions operate through invitation-only channels to enable candid exploration of system architecture questions, development challenges, and potential collaboration structures. These conversations focus on substantive technical and strategic issues rather than investment solicitation or business development.战略讨论通过仅邀请渠道运作,以支持坦诚探索系统架构问题、开发挑战和潜在合作结构。这些对话专注于实质性技术和战略问题,而非投资招揽或业务发展。

Discussion requests should include: 讨论请求应包括：
  • Background context (organization, expertise areas, relevant experience) 背景信息（组织、专业领域、相关经验）
  • Specific system architecture questions or collaboration interests 具体的系统架构问题或合作兴趣
  • Proposed discussion focus and objectives 提议的讨论重点和目标
Contact form placeholder: [Private discussion request form URL] 联系表单占位符：[私密讨论请求表单 URL]
Principles · 原则
Global Co-Building Principles · 原则
The following six principles define the operational framework for all Flux3 participation. These rules establish boundaries, clarify relationships, and set expectations for contributors across all engagement modes. Principles are non-negotiable and apply universally regardless of contribution type or stakeholder category.
以下六项原则定义所有 Flux3 参与的运营框架。这些规则建立边界、澄清关系并为所有参与模式的贡献者设定期望。原则不可协商,无论贡献类型或利益相关方类别如何普遍适用。
1
System Before Product
产品前系统
Development prioritizes architectural coherence and system-level integration over individual feature optimization or product refinement. Decisions favor long-term system viability even when this conflicts with near-term product appeal or market readiness.
开发优先考虑架构连贯性和系统级集成，而非单个功能优化或产品完善。即使与近期产品吸引力或市场准备度冲突，决策也有利于长期系统可行性。
This principle prevents premature optimization of specific implementations at the expense of architectural flexibility. System-level thinking maintains focus on interface definitions, control semantics, and integration patterns that enable diverse implementations rather than converging prematurely on particular technical solutions.
此原则防止以牺牲架构灵活性为代价过早优化特定实现。系统级思考保持对支持不同实现的接口定义、控制语义和集成模式的关注,而非过早收敛到特定技术解决方案。
2
Structure Before Speed
速度前结构
Sustainable development frameworks take precedence over accelerated timelines. The project invests in documentation, testing infrastructure, and coordination mechanisms even when this slows immediate progress. Rushing to demonstrations or prototypes without establishing proper foundations creates technical debt that impedes long-term development.
可持续开发框架优先于加速时间表。即使这减慢了即时进展，项目也投资于文档、测试基础设施和协调机制。在未建立适当基础的情况下急于演示或原型会产生阻碍长期开发的技术债务。
Development speed that sacrifices architectural clarity or integration robustness ultimately slows overall progress. Well-structured systems enable parallel development, clear hand-offs between contributors, and confident refactoring as understanding deepens. Rushed development creates integration brittleness that requires extensive rework.
牺牲架构清晰度或集成稳健性的开发速度最终减慢整体进展。结构良好的系统支持并行开发、贡献者之间的明确交接以及随着理解深化的自信重构。仓促开发创建需要大量返工的集成脆弱性。
3
Co-Building Is Not Employment
共建非雇佣
Participation through defined task structures does not create employment relationships, ongoing obligations, or hierarchical management dynamics. Contributors engage with specific scopes and maintain independence regarding timing, approach, and other commitments. This boundary enables participation patterns incompatible with traditional employment while maintaining clarity about mutual expectations.
通过定义的任务结构参与不创建雇佣关系、持续义务或层级管理动力。贡献者参与特定范围,并保持关于时间、方法和其他承诺的独立性。这种边界支持与传统雇佣不兼容的参与模式,同时保持关于相互期望的清晰度。
The distinction matters legally and operationally. Employment relationships involve ongoing obligations, comprehensive control, and long-term commitments that constrain organizational flexibility and limit participation accessibility. Task-based co-building maintains contributor autonomy while enabling systematic contribution tracking and appropriate recognition.
这种区别在法律和运营上很重要。雇佣关系涉及持续义务、全面控制和限制组织灵活性和限制参与可及性的长期承诺。基于任务的共建保持贡献者自主权,同时支持系统贡献跟踪和适当认可。
4
Open-Source Is Not Boundaryless
开源非无界
Open development operates within defined governance frameworks and decision-making structures. Not all contributions are automatically integrated; not all directions are equally valid. System architecture authority remains centralized to ensure coherence, while implementation creativity is distributed to leverage diverse expertise. This balance enables open participation without fragmenting system integrity.
开放开发在定义的治理框架和决策结构内运作。并非所有贡献都自动集成；并非所有方向都同样有效。系统架构权威保持集中以确保连贯性，而实施创造力分布以利用不同专业知识。这种平衡支持开放参与而不破坏系统完整性。
Open-source principles emphasize accessibility and transparency, not unlimited autonomy. Contributors work within architectural constraints, interface specifications, and quality standards that protect system coherence. Governance mechanisms resolve conflicts, evaluate proposals, and maintain development direction while remaining transparent and accountable to the contributor community.
开源原则强调可及性和透明度,而非无限自主权。贡献者在保护系统连贯性的架构约束、接口规范和质量标准内工作。治理机制解决冲突、评估提案并保持开发方向,同时对贡献者社区保持透明和问责。
5
Contributions Are Traceable & Attributable
贡献可追溯可归因
All work is documented with clear attribution and maintained in accessible records. Contribution tracking serves multiple purposes: recognizing individual efforts, building contributor reputation, enabling verification of participation history, and supporting appropriate credit in professional contexts. Attribution is not optional; systematic recording is fundamental to the co-building framework.
所有工作都记录有明确归属并保存在可访问记录中。贡献跟踪服务于多个目的：认可个人努力、建立贡献者声誉、支持验证参与历史以及支持专业背景下的适当学分。归属不是可选的；系统记录是共建框架的基础。
Traceability enables accountability while protecting contributor rights. When contributions are properly documented, disputes about attribution or intellectual property can be resolved through reference to recorded evidence. Transparent tracking also builds trust within the community by demonstrating that recognition is systematic rather than arbitrary.
可追溯性支持问责,同时保护贡献者权利。当贡献得到适当记录时,关于归属或知识产权的争议可以通过参考记录证据解决。透明跟踪还通过展示认可是系统性而非任意性来在社区内建立信任。
6
No Return Promises; Transparency Guaranteed
无回报承诺;透明度保证
Financial returns, product deliveries, and commercial outcomes are not promised, guaranteed, or implied. Participation enables system validation work without creating expectations of tangible benefits or economic returns. What IS guaranteed: transparent reporting of development progress, accessible documentation of decision-making, and open accounting of resource utilization.
不承诺、保证或暗示财务回报、产品交付和商业结果。参与支持系统验证工作，不创建对有形利益或经济回报的期望。所保证的是：开发进度的透明报告、决策的可访问文档以及资源利用的公开核算。
This principle establishes clear expectations: contributors and supporters enable development work rather than purchasing future products or investing for returns. Transparency commitments provide accountability without creating obligations for specific outcomes. Progress is documented openly; setbacks are reported honestly; decisions are explained clearly.
此原则建立明确期望:贡献者和支持者支持开发工作,而非购买未来产品或为回报投资。透明承诺提供问责,不创建特定结果的义务。进度公开记录;挫折诚实报告;决策清楚解释。
White Paper 白皮书
System Co-Building White Paper · 系统共建白皮书
The Flux3 System Co-Building White Paper provides comprehensive documentation of system architecture, development frameworks, participation mechanisms, and governance structures. This document serves as the authoritative reference for all stakeholder groups seeking detailed understanding of system concepts, technical approaches, and collaboration protocols.
Flux3 系统共建白皮书提供系统架构、开发框架、参与机制和治理结构的综合文档。本文档作为所有寻求系统概念、技术方法和协作协议详细理解的利益相关方群体的权威参考。
Download White Paper v0.1
下载白皮书 v0.1
Current version: 0.1 (Initial Release)
当前版本：0.1（初始发布）
Format: PDF, 120 pages
格式：PDF，120页
Languages: English / 中文
语言:English / 中文
Download link placeholder: [White Paper PDF URL]
下载链接占位符：[白皮书 PDF URL]
Document Structure
文档结构
01
System Definition
系统定义
Comprehensive explanation of tri-modal architecture, interface concepts, and design principles
三栖架构、接口概念和设计原则的综合解释
02
Technical Framework
技术框架
Detailed specifications of system layers, control architectures, and integration protocols
系统层、控制架构和集成协议的详细规范
03
Development Roadmap
开发路线图
Phase structures, milestone definitions, and validation methodologies
阶段结构、里程碑定义和验证方法论
04
Co-Building Framework
共建框架
Participation mechanisms, contribution protocols, and recognition structures
参与机制、贡献协议和认可结构
05
Governance & Principles
治理与原则
Decision-making structures, accountability mechanisms, and operational rules
决策结构、问责机制和运营规则
Version History & Updates · 版本历史与更新
The white paper evolves as system development progresses and understanding deepens. Version updates reflect refinements to technical specifications, clarifications of governance frameworks, and incorporation of insights from validation activities. All versions remain accessible to enable tracking of conceptual evolution over time.
白皮书随着系统开发的进展和理解的深化而不断演变。版本更新反映了对技术规范的完善、治理框架的澄清以及验证活动中获得的洞察的整合。所有版本都保持可访问性，以便跟踪概念随时间的演变。

White paper updates follow semantic versioning principles. Minor version increments (0.x) indicate refinements and clarifications that do not fundamentally alter system architecture or participation frameworks. Major version increments (x.0) reflect substantial changes to core concepts or operational structures.
白皮书更新遵循语义版本控制原则。次要版本增量（0.x）表示不根本改变系统架构或参与框架的完善和澄清。主要版本增量（x.0）反映了核心概念或运营结构的实质性变化。
Contact · 联系方式
Contact · 联系方式
Contact channels are organized by engagement type to ensure inquiries reach appropriate response teams and receive contextually relevant information. Selecting the correct channel improves response quality and accelerates meaningful engagement.
联系渠道按参与类型组织,以确保查询到达适当的响应团队并接收上下文相关信息。选择正确渠道提高响应质量并加速有意义的参与。
Academic Collaboration
学术合作
For universities, research institutions, and scholars interested in system-level research collaboration. Inquiries regarding joint investigation, publication opportunities, or academic workshop participation.
面向有兴趣进行系统级研究合作的大学、研究机构和学者。关于联合调查、出版机会或学术研讨会参与的查询。
Contact form: [Academia contact form URL]
联系表单: [学术联系表单 URL]
Co-Building & Tasks
共建与任务
For engineers and technical contributors interested in module development, task participation, or open-source contributions. Technical questions regarding system architecture or implementation approaches.
面向有兴趣进行模块开发、任务参与或开源贡献的工程师和技术贡献者。关于系统架构或实施方法的技术问题。
Contact form: [Co-building contact form URL]
联系表单: [共建联系表单 URL]
Crowdfunding Support
众筹支持
For individuals interested in supporting system validation through crowdfunding. Questions regarding support levels, fund utilization, or participation benefits.
面向有兴趣通过众筹支持系统验证的个人。关于支持级别、资金利用或参与利益的查询。
Contact form: [Support contact form URL]
联系表单: [支持联系表单 URL]
Industry Scenarios
行业场景
For industry partners, municipal entities, or scenario stakeholders interested in validation collaboration. Inquiries regarding use case exploration or scenario-based testing frameworks.
面向有兴趣进行验证合作的行业合作伙伴、市政实体或场景利益相关方。关于用例探索或基于场景的测试框架的查询。
Contact form: [Industry contact form URL]
联系表单: [产业联系表单 URL]
System-Level Discussion
系统级讨论
For strategic stakeholders interested in private discussions regarding system architecture, development direction, or participation structures. Request 20-minute technical/strategic conversations.
面向有兴趣就系统架构、开发方向或参与结构进行私密讨论的战略利益相关方。请求 20 分钟技术/战略对话。
Contact form: [Private discussion request form URL]
联系表单: [私密讨论请求表单 URL]
Variables · 变量
Variable Links · Implementation Requirements · 变量链接 · 实施要求
To make this platform fully operational, five categories of links must be established. These connections integrate external infrastructure with the Flux3 system interface. Each link category serves specific stakeholder groups and enables distinct forms of engagement.
为使该平台完全运行,必须建立五类链接。这些连接将外部基础设施与 Flux3 系统接口集成。每个链接类别服务于特定利益相关方群体并支持不同形式的参与。
1
ETH Zurich Official Links
ETH 苏黎世官方链接
For universities, research institutions, and scholars interested in system-level research collaboration. Inquiries regarding joint investigation, publication opportunities, or academic workshop participation.
面向有兴趣进行系统级研究合作的大学、研究机构和学者。关于联合调查、出版机会或学术研讨会参与的查询。
Links to labs, teams, or professor homepages from the official ETH domain. These links establish research alignment and support direct access to relevant academic work.
来自官方 ETH 域的实验室、团队或教授主页 URL。这些链接建立研究方向对齐并支持直接访问相关学术工作。
Required: 2-4 official ETH Zurich URLs
要求:2-4 个官方 ETH Zurich URL
2
GitHub Repository
GitHub 仓库
Central code repository hosting system modules, documentation, and technical specifications. Enables distributed co-building and provides transparency into development activities.
托管系统模块、文档和技术规范的中央代码仓库。支持分布式共建并提供开发活动的透明度。
Required: GitHub organization URL
要求:GitHub 组织 URL
3
Crowdfunding Platform
众筹平台
External crowdfunding service handling financial transactions, support level management, and community coordination. Separates funding operations from system development activities.
处理金融交易、支持级别管理和社区协调的外部众筹服务。将资金运营与系统开发活动分离。
Required: Crowdfunding campaign URL
要求:众筹活动 URL
4
Community Channels
社区渠道
Real-time communication platforms (Discord/Slack/WeChat) enabling technical discussions, coordination, and community building. Provides synchronous interaction channels complementing asynchronous development workflows.
支持技术讨论、协调和社区建设的实时通信平台（Discord/Slack/微信）。提供补充异步开发工作流的同步交互渠道。
Required: 1-2 community platform URLs
要求:1-2 个社区平台 URL
5
Private Contact Forms
私人联系表单
Structured intake forms (Typeform/Google Forms) for different stakeholder categories. Ensures inquiries contain necessary context and reach appropriate response teams.
针对不同利益相关方类别的结构化接收表单（Typeform/Google Forms）。确保查询包含必要背景并到达适当的响应团队。
Required: 5 category-specific form URLs
要求:5 个类别特定表单 URL
Additional Development Options · 额外开发选项
Beyond the core interface structure, several enhancement opportunities exist to increase platform utility and engagement effectiveness. These additions are not required for basic functionality but significantly improve stakeholder experience and operational efficiency。
除核心接口结构外,存在几种增强机会以提高平台效用和参与有效性。这些添加对于基本功能不是必需的,但显著改善利益相关方体验和运营效率。
Enhanced Page Formatting
增强页面格式
Title hierarchy and layout recommendations for each page section. Provides visual consistency and improves information architecture across the entire platform。
每个页面部分的标题层级和布局建议。提供视觉一致性并改善整个平台的信息架构。
Refined International Copy
优化国际文案
More concise bilingual versions optimized for international academic audiences. Streamlines messaging for European and North American research communities。
为国际学术受众优化的更简洁的双语版本。简化面向欧洲和北美研究社区的消息传递。
Demonstration Task Board
演示任务板
Initial set of 10 example tasks showing complete specifications. Provides concrete templates and immediately makes the task board feel active and operational。
初始集包含 10 个显示完整规范的示例任务。提供具体模板并立即使任务板感觉活跃和可操作。
Information Architecture Summary · 信息架构总结
The complete Flux3 platform organizes into a coherent information architecture serving five primary stakeholder categories through dedicated pathways. Each pathway maintains consistent design language and operational principles while addressing category-specific needs and contexts。
完整的 Flux3 平台组织为连贯的信息架构,通过专用路径服务五个主要利益相关方类别。每条路径在处理类别特定需求和背景的同时保持一致的设计语言和运营原则。
Academia
学术界
Research collaboration, academic alignment, ETH references
研究合作、学术对齐、ETH 参考
Co-Builders
共同建设者
Technical roadmap, open modules, task structures
技术路线图、开放模块、任务结构
Supporters
支持者
Validation funding, support levels, transparent reporting
验证资金、支持级别、透明报告
Industry
行业
Scenario exploration, validation frameworks, use cases
场景探索、验证框架、用例
Investors
投资者
System judgment, structural participation, ecosystem connection
系统判断、结构参与、生态系统连接
Home Page Entry Point Design · 主页入口设计
The home page serves as the critical first touchpoint, requiring immediate clarity about system identity and stakeholder pathways. Four essential elements must be communicated within 30 seconds of arrival: what Flux3 is, what it is not, why it matters now, and how different stakeholders should engage. 主页作为关键的首次接触点,要求关于系统身份和利益相关方路径的即时清晰度。四个基本要素必须在到达后 30 秒内传达:Flux3 是什么、不是什么、为什么现在重要以及不同利益相关方应如何参与。
01
System-Level Definition 系统级定义
Not a product — interface architecture for tri-modal coordination 不是产品 — 三栖协调的接口架构
02
Global Co-Building Position 全球共建定位
Open validation initiative, not commercial development 开放验证计划,非商业开发
03
Academic & Technical Credibility 学术与技术信誉
ETH and university research alignment entry points ETH 和大学研究对齐入口点
04
Clear Role-Based Entry 明确的基于角色的入口
Five distinct pathways with explicit expectations 五条具有明确期望的不同路径

The home page explicitly avoids detailed content, parameter specifications, or task listings. Depth belongs in dedicated pathway pages. The entry experience prioritizes orientation and direction over information density. 主页明确避免详细内容、参数规范或任务列表。深度属于专用路径页面。入口体验优先考虑方向和导向而非信息密度。
Five Pathway Architecture · 五条路径架构
Each stakeholder category receives a dedicated landing page optimized for their context, concerns, and contribution modalities. While all pathways connect to the same underlying system development, their presentation differs substantially to match stakeholder mental models and decision criteria. 每个利益相关方类别接收针对其背景、关注点和贡献模式优化的专用登陆页面。虽然所有路径连接到同一基础系统开发,但其呈现显著不同以匹配利益相关方心智模型和决策标准。
Pathway Characteristics · 路径特征
Universities and research teams encounter academic framing emphasizing exploratory investigation, publication opportunities, and non-commercial collaboration. Language avoids product terminology in favor of research concepts and methodological frameworks. 大学和研究团队遇到的学术框架强调探索性研究、出版机会和非商业合作。语言避免产品术语,转而使用研究概念和方法论框架。
Engineers and co-builders see technical roadmaps, module specifications, and contribution mechanisms. This pathway prioritizes architectural clarity, task definitions, and integration protocols while maintaining boundaries around employment relationships. 工程师和共建者看到技术路线图、模块规范、贡献机制。此路径优先考虑架构清晰度、任务定义和集成协议,同时保持雇佣关系界限。
Community supporters find validation funding contexts stripped of investment language. This pathway emphasizes transparency, support level benefits, and system development impact while explicitly disclaiming financial returns. 社区支持者发现剥离投资语言的验证资金背景。此路径强调透明度、支持级别利益和系统开发影响,同时明确否认财务回报。
Pathway Characteristics · 路径特征
Universities and research teams encounter academic framing emphasizing exploratory investigation, publication opportunities, and non-commercial collaboration. Language avoids product terminology in favor of research concepts and methodological frameworks. 大学和研究团队遇到的学术框架强调探索性研究、出版机会和非商业合作。语言避免产品术语,转而使用研究概念和方法论框架。
Engineers and co-builders see technical roadmaps, module specifications, and contribution mechanisms. This pathway prioritizes architectural clarity, task definitions, and integration protocols while maintaining boundaries around employment relationships. 工程师和共建者看到技术路线图、模块规范、贡献机制。此路径优先考虑架构清晰度、任务定义和集成协议,同时保持关于雇佣关系的边界。
Community supporters find validation funding contexts stripped of investment language. This pathway emphasizes transparency, support level benefits, and system development impact while explicitly disclaiming financial returns. 社区支持者发现剥离投资语言的验证资金背景。此路径强调透明度、支持级别利益和系统开发影响,同时明确否认财务回报。
Content Organization Principles · 内容组织原则
Consistent organizational principles apply across all pathway pages despite different content focus. These structural patterns enable coherent navigation while accommodating specialized information requirements for each stakeholder category. 尽管内容焦点不同,一致的组织原则适用于所有路径页面。这些结构模式支持连贯导航,同时适应每个利益相关方类别的专业信息要求。
Positioning First
优先定位
Every pathway begins with clear context about what this engagement means and what it does not include 每条路径始于关于此参与意味着什么以及不包括什么的清晰背景
Scope Before Details
范围先于细节
Boundaries and frameworks precede specific opportunities or technical specifications
边界和框架先于特定机会或技术规范
Disclaimers Prominent
免责声明突出
Non-commitments and clarifications appear early and repeatedly to prevent misunderstanding 非承诺和澄清早期和重复出现以防止防止误解
Action Last
行动置后
Contact forms and engagement mechanisms follow after complete context establishment 联系表单和参与机制在完整背景建立后跟随
Global Co-Building Rules Declaration · 全球共建规则声明
The principles page functions as Flux3's constitutional document — the foundational statement of operational philosophy that governs all activities and relationships. This declaration serves multiple critical purposes: establishing expectations, preventing misalignment, providing accountability reference, and enabling confident participation through clarity。 原则页面作为 Flux3 的宪法文件 — 治理所有活动和关系的运营哲学的基础声明。此声明服务于多个关键目的:建立期望、防止失调、提供问责参考以及通过清晰度支持自信参与。

These six principles are non-negotiable and apply universally. They define what Flux3 is and how it operates. Any participation that requires deviation from these principles is incompatible with the project structure and cannot be accommodated regardless of potential benefits。 这六项原则不可协商并普遍适用。它们定义 Flux3 是什么以及如何运作。任何需要偏离这些原则的参与都与项目结构不兼容,无论潜在利益如何都无法适应。
The principles page importance cannot be overstated. This is where Flux3 states explicitly what makes it different from conventional development projects, commercial ventures, or traditional research initiatives. The clarity established here prevents countless future conflicts, misunderstandings, and disappointments that arise when implicit assumptions diverge。原则页面的重要性怎么强调都不为过。这是 Flux3 明确声明其与传统开发项目、商业企业或传统研究计划的不同之处。这里建立的清晰度防止了无数未来冲突、误解和因隐含假设分歧而产生的失望。
Implementation & Next Steps · 实施与下一步
Activating this platform requires completing the variable link integrations, establishing communication infrastructure, and initiating content population across pathway pages. Priority should focus on enabling basic functionality before optimizing presentation or expanding content depth。 激活此平台需要完成变量链接集成、建立通信基础设施并启动跨路径页面的内容填充。优先级应关注在优化呈现或扩展内容深度之前支持基本功能。
1
Phase 1: Infrastructure
阶段 1: 基础设施
Establish GitHub, contact forms, community channels 建立 GitHub、联系表单、社区渠道
2
Phase 2: Link Integration
阶段 2: 链接集成
Connect ETH references, crowdfunding, communication platforms 连接 ETH 参考、众筹、通信平台
3
Phase 3: Content Activation
阶段 3: 内容激活
Populate task board, publish white paper, activate pathways 填充任务板、发布白皮书、激活路径
4
Phase 4: Community Launch
阶段 4: 社区启动
Open engagement channels, begin stakeholder outreach 开放参与渠道、开始利益相关方外展
This platform represents a complete system interface for global co-building engagement. Every stakeholder category has a clear entry point, explicit expectations, and defined participation mechanisms. The architecture maintains internal consistency while serving diverse needs. Implementation transforms this design into operational infrastructure supporting Flux3 system validation。 该平台代表全球共建参与的完整系统接口。每个利益相关方类别都有明确的入口点、明确的期望和定义的参与机制。架构在服务不同需求的同时保持内部一致性。实施将此设计转化为支持 Flux3 系统验证的运营基础设施。